In the wake of yesterday's determination lays shards of
constitutional protections for women. But this was only meant as
collateral damage, for the true target of this convoluted mis-conception
was President Obama's signature piece of legislation.
For all of us who looked on as the justices opened the
floodgates to further attacks on the Affordable Care Act, it should
serve as clarion call to examine the blurring of the lines between
politics and the judicial branch. The not so fab five have taken an
active role in reshaping the landscape of our nation, impacting the
ability of the most oppressed to vote, sanctioning endless financial
opportunity for the few to control the election process and reducing to
rubble the clearly intended meaning of legislation forged to protect a
vast portion of our citizenry. Logic and precedent have been reduced to
the role of bench-warmers.
The assault on our rights and our way of life continues
unabated and will remain in jeopardy for as long as the starting five is
permitted to act with such utter disdain and contempt for the dictates
of the Constitution and the citizens of this nation. It is beyond time
that we entered into a serious 21st century discussion about term limits
for those who sit on this bench decade after decade, impervious and ill
intended.
1 comment:
You said it beautifully. And by the way, does this mean that I can refuse to pay income tax to any government that backs contraception, or abortion?
Post a Comment