We
have been caught in a terrible tug of war between turning a blind eye
to the morally reprehensible conduct of Mr. Assad and committing our
nation to combat such atrocity. We lost our will for the use of military
might after enduring far too many years of mid-East debacles. We were
initially led into battle by President Bush under the rubric of
destroying those with, we later discovered, non-existent weapons of mass
destruction.
For
all it has cost us, both economically and in lost lives, we could not
even pretend we had accomplished our stated mission. Our efforts have
proven woefully ineffective.
It
was not merely that Mr. Obama did not hunt down the brutal Syrian
leader after he crossed that famous red line with the use of chemical
weapons on his own. It was that Congress and the American people did
not support or authorize such an incursion.
And
now President Trump, woefully unprepared, must answer the same question
that haunted the last administration. Mr. Trump is not cut from the
same cloth as President Obama and may well feel less of a moral
imperative to intervene.
But
whatever his ultimate decision, it is likely not to lead to a permanent
resolution of an imbroglio that will continue to cause aftershocks not
only in Syria but around the globe.
Morality, it seems, is a negotiable commodity.
2 comments:
It is beyond the power of this, or any president, to adopt a policy that will lead to a permanent solution, because such a policy does not exist. There are no options to take, no sanctions to impose, and no coalition that exists or can be cobbled together, with the strength or will or wisdom, to make a difference. How incredibly sad to see such horror and suffering and injustice, and know that this, at least for now, is the reality of the situation.
that is a well worded and sadly all too true comment
RSN
Post a Comment